Results for 'Ted Alan Warfield'

921 found
Order:
  1. (1 other version)Causal determinism and human freedom are incompatible: A new argument for incompatibilism.Ted A. Warfield - 2000 - Philosophical Perspectives 14:167-180.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  2. Privileged self-knowledge and externalism are compatible.Ted A. Warfield - 1992 - Analysis 52 (4):232-37.
    I argue that externalism about mental content is consistent with the thesis that individuals need not investigate their environment to come to know the contents of their thoughts. In particular, externalism is consistent with the thesis that we come to know the contents of our thoughts on the basis of introspection.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  3. When epistemic closure does and does not fail: a lesson from the history of epistemology.Ted A. Warfield - 2004 - Analysis 64 (1):35-41.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  4.  18
    Kompatybilizm i inkompatybilizm: wybrane argumenty.Ted A. Warfield - 2006 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 54 (1):217-240.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5. Knowledge from falsehood.Ted A. Warfield - 2005 - Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):405–416.
  6. Compatibilism and incompatibilism : Some arguments.Ted Warfield - 2003 - In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  7.  62
    (1 other version)A Priori Knowledge of the World: Knowing the World by Knowing Our Minds.Ted A. Warfield - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 92 (1/2):127 - 147.
  8. Determinism and moral responsiblity are incompatible.Ted A. Warfield - 1996 - Philosophical Topics 24 (2):215-26.
  9. Externalism, privileged self-knowledge, and the irrelevance of slow switching.Ted A. Warfield - 1997 - Analysis 57 (4):282-284.
  10. On Freedom and Foreknowledge.Ted A. Warfield - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):255-259.
    William Hasker and Anthony Brueckner have critically discussed my argument for the compatibility of divine foreknowledge and human freedom. I reply to their commentaries.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  11.  69
    Deductive Closure and Relevant Alternatives.Ted A. Warfield - 1991 - Southwest Philosophical Studies 13.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Knowing the world and knowing our minds.Ted A. Warfield - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (3):525-545.
    In Reason, Truth and History Hilary Putnam offered an argument purporting to show that Brain-in-a-Vat skepticism can be refuted on the assumption that central features of the causal theory of reference are correct. Many philosophers have discussed Putnam’s proposal, defending both the pro and con sides of the debate. The debate continues in the current literature with Putnamians such as Tymoczko and Dell’Utri offering ever more intricate defenses of the anti-skeptical position and critics such as David and Brueckner rebutting these (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  13.  58
    Against representational theories of consciousness.Ted A. Warfield - 1999 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (1):66-69.
    In recent years, the primary focus of many philosophers of mind has shifted to consciousness. And a growing number of philosophers, attempting to exploit some of the advances of the previous decade's work on intentionality, are advocating representational theories of consciousness. Representationalists have spent much time defending their characteristic thesis and have devoted much effort to some of the peculiar problems facing theories of consciousness . They have expended precious little energy answering more basic questions like ‘What makes a conscious (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  14. On a semantic argument against conceptual role semantics.Ted A. Warfield - 1993 - Analysis 53 (4):298-304.
  15. What Price Coherence?Peter Klein & Ted A. Warfield - 1994 - Analysis 54 (3):129 - 132.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   60 citations  
  16. Folk psychological ceteris paribus laws?Ted A. Warfield - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 71 (1):99-112.
  17.  36
    Heimir Geirsson and Michael Losonsky, eds., Readings in language and mind.Ted A. Warfield - 1999 - Minds and Machines 9 (2):290-293.
  18. (1 other version)Ockhamism and Molinism -- Foreknowledge and Prophecy.Ted A. Warfield - 2009 - In Jonathan L. Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Religion, vol. 2. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  19. Knowledge-closure and skepticism.Marian David & Ted A. Warfield - 2008 - In Quentin Smith (ed.), Epistemology: new essays. New York : Oxford University Press,: Oxford University Press.
  20. When Doctors Kill Patients: Vital Organ Transplants.Ted A. Warfield - 2002 - Philosophic Exchange 32 (1).
    This paper attempts to discern exactly what is happening in some medical situations involving patients who are, in different ways, near death. In order to arrive at a correct moral evaluation of these practices, it is necessary to begin with a careful analysis of exactly what is happening, and then proceed to moral evaluation. This paper argues that declarations of death in many vital organ transplants are unjustified. Thus, probably there are killings occurring in these cases. However, there is no (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  17
    Ockhamizm a molinizm: przedwiedza i proroctwo.Ted A. Warfield - 2013 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 61 (1):109-124.
    przeł. Małgorzata Polanowska i Marcin Iwanicki.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  29
    10. Metaphysical Compatibilism's Appropriation of Frankfurt.Ted A. Warfield - 2007 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 3:283.
  23.  96
    Putting skeptics in their place: The nature of skeptical arguments and their role in philosophical inquiry.Ted A. Warfield - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (4):642-644.
    John Greco’s Putting Skeptics in Their Place is an important book. Greco persuasively argues that the best skeptical arguments cannot be easily dismissed and should not be ignored. These arguments cannot be easily dismissed because they defend important conclusions and make no obvious mistake. The arguments should not be ignored because their proper analysis reveals much about central philosophical notions such as knowledge and evidence. While defending these conclusions Greco offers sophisticated metaepistemological and metaphilosophical reflections. Philosophers properly attending to the (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  24. Tyler Burge's self-knowledge.Ted A. Warfield - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 70 (1):169-178.
    The question of whether externalism about mental content is compatible with privileged access is a question of ongoing concern within philosophy of mind. Some philosophers think that Tyler Burge's early work on what he calls "basic self-knowledge" shows that externalism and privileged access are compatible. I critically assess this claim, arguing that Burge's work does not establish the compatbility thesis.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Deliberation and metaphysical freedom.E. J. Coffman & Ted A. Warfield - 2005 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29 (1):25-44.
  26. Divine foreknowledge and human freedom are compatible.Ted A. Warfield - 1997 - Noûs 31 (1):80-86.
  27. The mind argument and libertarianism.Alicia Finch & Ted A. Warfield - 1998 - Mind 107 (427):515-28.
    Many critics of libertarian freedom have charged that freedom is incompatible with indeterminism. We show that the strongest argument that has been provided for this claim is invalid. The invalidity of the argument in question, however, implies the invalidity of the standard Consequence argument for the incompatibility of freedom and determinism. We show how to repair the Consequence argument and argue that no similar improvement will revive the worry about the compatibility of indeterminism and freedom.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   54 citations  
  28. Compatibilism.Ted Warfield - 2003 - In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29. Fodorian semantics: A reply to Adams and Aizawa. [REVIEW]Ted A. Warfield - 1994 - Minds and Machines 4 (2):205-14.
    In a recent article in this journal (Adams and Aizawa 1992), Fred Adams and Ken Aizawa argued that Jerry Fodor's proposed naturalistic sufficient condition for meaning is unsatisfactory. In this paper, I respond to Adams and Aizawa, noting that (1) they have overestimated the importance of their “pathologies” objection, perhaps as a consequence of misunderstanding Fodor's asymmetric dependency condition, (2) they have misunderstood Fodor's asymmetric dependency condition in formulating their Twin Earth objection, and (3) they have, in addition to under (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  30. Disagreement.Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) - 2010 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
    Disagreement is common: even informed, intelligent, and generally reasonable people often come to different conclusions when confronted with what seems to be the same evidence. Can the competing conclusions be reasonable? If not, what can we reasonably think about the situation? This volume examines the epistemology of disagreement. Philosophical questions about disagreement arise in various areas, notably politics, ethics, aesthetics, and the philosophy of religion: but this will be the first book focusing on the general epistemic issues arising from informed (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   84 citations  
  31. The Irrelevance of Indeterministic Counterexamples to Principle Beta.Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):173-184.
    Incompatibilism about freedom and causal determinism is commonly supported by appeal to versions of the well known Consequence argument. Critics of theConsequence argument have presented counterexamples to the Consequence argument’s central inference principle. The thesis of this article is that proponents of the Consequence argument can easily bypass even the best of these counterexamples.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  32.  86
    Reply to Clark and Smolensky: Do connectionist minds have beliefs?Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield - 1991 - In Cynthia MacDonald & Graham MacDonald (eds.), Connectionism: Debates on Psychological Explanation. Blackwell. pp. 2.
  33. Mental Representation: A Reader.Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) - 1994 - Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
    This volume is a collection of new and previously published essays focusing on one of the most exciting and actively discussed topics in contemporary philosophy: naturalistic theories of mental content. The volume brings together important papers written by some of the most distinguished theorists working in the field today. Authors contributing to the volume include Jerry Fodor, Ruth Millikan, Fred Dretske, Ned Block, Robert Cummins, and Daniel Dennett.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations  
  34. Jaegwon Kim, Mind in a Physical World.Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield - 2001 - Noûs 35 (2):304-316.
  35. No help for the coherentist.Peter Klein & Ted A. Warfield - 1996 - Analysis 56 (2):118-121.
  36. Fatalism.Alicia Finch & Ted A. Warfield - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (2):233-238.
    The logical fatalist holds that the past truth of future tense propositions is incompatible with libertarian freedom. The theological fatalist holds that the combination of God’s past beliefs with His essential omniscience is incompatible with libertarian freedom. There is an ongoing dispute over the relation between these two kinds of fatalism: some philosophers believe that the problems are equivalent while others believe that the theological problem is more difficult. We offer a diagnosis of this dispute showing that one’s view of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  37. The Relationship Between Moral Responsibility and Freedom.Benjamin Rossi & Ted Warfield - 2016 - In Kevin Timpe, Meghan Griffith & Neil Levy (eds.), Routledge Companion to Free Will. New York: Routledge. pp. 612-623.
  38.  67
    The Metaphysics of Free Will. [REVIEW]Ted A. Warfield - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (2):261-265.
  39. Skepticism: Contemporary Readings.Keith DeRose & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
  40.  4
    (1 other version)Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind.Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) - 2002 - Blackwell.
    Comprising a series of specially commissioned chapters by leading scholars, this comprehensive volume presents an up-to-date survey of the central themes in the philosophy of mind. It leads the reader through a broad range of topics, including Artificial Intelligence, Consciousness, Dualism, Emotions, Folk Psychology, Free Will, Individualism, Personal Identity and The Mind-Body Problem. Provides a state of the art overview of philosophy of mind. Contains 16 newly-commissioned articles, all of which are written by internationally distinguished scholars. Each chapter reviews a (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. Alfred Mele's metaphysical freedom?E. J. Coffman & Ted A. Warfield - 2007 - Philosophical Explorations 10 (2):185 – 194.
    In this paper we raise three questions of clarification about Alfred Mele's fine recent book, Free Will and Luck. Our questions concern the following topics: (i) Mele's combination of 'luck' and 'Frankfurt-style' objections to libertarianism, (ii) Mele's stipulations about 'compatibilism' and the relation between questions about free action and questions about moral responsibility, and (iii) Mele's treatment of the Consequence Argument.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  42.  24
    JME Referees in 2002.Mary Lou Arnold, Matthew Keefer, Nigel Laurie, Marvin Berkowitz, Nigel Blake, Brian Mahon, Li Maosen, Ted Brelsford, Alan Reiman & David Carr - 2003 - Journal of Moral Education 32 (2):215-215.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  15
    Richard Feldman and Ted A. Warfield, eds. , Disagreement . Reviewed by.David Haugen - 2011 - Philosophy in Review 31 (4):267-270.
  44.  46
    Environmental Values and Human Purposes.Ted Benton - 2008 - Environmental Values 17 (2):201 - 220.
    Some writings by Alan Holland provide the starting point for an exploration of sources of environmental value in human social practices. It is argued that many practices both serve human purposes and also provide a setting for the emergence of environmental value. Such practices are ones in which activity is embedded in, and so both strongly constrained and enabled by, its conditions and media. Capitalist 'modernisation' has tended to erode these practices and associated values in favour of external purposes (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  45.  74
    Book reviews. [REVIEW]Eric A. Weiss, Justin Leiber, Judith Felson Duchan, Mallory Selfridge, Eric Dietrich, Peter A. Facione, Timothy Joseph Day, Johan M. Lammens, Andrew Feenberg, Deborah G. Johnson, Daniel S. Levine & Ted A. Warfield - 1995 - Minds and Machines 5 (1):109-155.
  46.  68
    Late night thoughts on the cosmic self-new and old: A reflection on the cosmic self:. A penetrating look at today's new age movements by Ted Peters.Alan Riddiford - 1994 - Zygon 29 (3):437-446.
    Responding to Ted Peters's The Cosmic Self, the author finds parallels and dissonances between New Age assertions and traditional mysticism, East and West. The comprehensive consciousness and interconnectedness of life are addressed by various mysticisms in their search for spiritual realities. However, many of the most recent movements are distinguished by superficiality.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  57
    Disagreement. Edited by Richard Feldman and Ted A. Warfield. (Oxford UP, 2010. Pp. 291. Price $35.00.).Jeffrey Glick - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):422-425.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  48.  28
    Gestalts, Refrains, and Philosophical Pluralism.Alan Drengson & Tim Quick - 2006 - Environmental Philosophy 3 (2):17-27.
    This paper is a response to Ted Toadvine’s article “Gestalts and Refrains: On the Musical Structure of Nature,” in Environmental Philosophy 2.2 (2005). We propose a more generous interpretation of Naess’s gestalt ontology, one that we believe mitigates Toadvine’s criticisms. Gestalt ontology and refrain ontology offer two different yet compatible ontologies for environmental philosophers searching for viable alternatives to scientific reductionism. Encouraging many ontologies also encourages a rich philosophical pluralism.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. Modality and objects.Alan Sidelle - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):109-125.
    A not-unpopular position in the metaphysics of material objects (Ted Sider's, for instance) combines realism about what objects there are and the conditions of objecthood with conventionalism about de re modality. I argue that this is not a coherent combination of views: one must go fully conventionalist, or fully realist. The central argument displays the difficulty for the modal conventionalist/object realist in specifying the object that satisfies de re modal predicates. I argue that if this is a mind-independent object, contradictions (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  50. Review of Disagreement, Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), 2010. [REVIEW]Amir Dastmalchian - 2012 - Religious Studies 48 (1):119-122.
1 — 50 / 921